There is a card from Unfinity that is very important to the Pauper format but isn't implemented on mtgo: Command Performance.
I'm aware that Daybreak doesn't intend to bring stickers on the platform, but Command Performance would have an easy workaround, like ____ Goblin, contrary to what a first look might suggest.
As far as I know, there is only one deck that runs Command Performance, and it plays it strictly to apply power/toughness stickers. It's a very strong deck, but currently underplayed because it can't be tested on mtgo. You can see the deck in this article, under the name of Giorgio Venditti.
Considering the best P/T sheets (that you can see in the article), I believe that the card could simply read like this:
Roll a d20:
1-18: Choose a creature, its base power and toughness become 5-1
19-20: Choose a creature, its base power and toughness become 4-2
Occasionally, the deck uses stickers for abilities like menace or lifelink, and of course I would like if the team wanted to add these options, but I understand if they can't. I think that what I proposed is the most reasonable compromise and it would really help reuniting the paper and the online format.
I'm aware that Daybreak doesn't intend to bring stickers on the platform, but Command Performance would have an easy workaround, like ____ Goblin, contrary to what a first look might suggest.
As far as I know, there is only one deck that runs Command Performance, and it plays it strictly to apply power/toughness stickers. It's a very strong deck, but currently underplayed because it can't be tested on mtgo. You can see the deck in this article, under the name of Giorgio Venditti.
Considering the best P/T sheets (that you can see in the article), I believe that the card could simply read like this:
Roll a d20:
1-18: Choose a creature, its base power and toughness become 5-1
19-20: Choose a creature, its base power and toughness become 4-2
Occasionally, the deck uses stickers for abilities like menace or lifelink, and of course I would like if the team wanted to add these options, but I understand if they can't. I think that what I proposed is the most reasonable compromise and it would really help reuniting the paper and the online format.